Référence
bibliographique complète |
| FISCHER L., A. KÄÄB, C. HUGGEL, J. NOETZLI. Geology, glacier retreat and permafrost degradation as controlling factors of slope instabilities in a high-mountain rock wall: the Monte Rosa east face. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 2006, vol 6, pp. 761-772. |
| Mots-clés |
Glacier retreat, permafrost degradation, geology, slope instabilities, detachment zones, permafrost models, Monte Rosa |
|
Organismes
/ Contacts |
Glaciology and Geomorphodynamics Group, Department of Geography, University of Zurich, luzfisch@geo.unizh.ch. |
| (1)
- Paramètre(s) atmosphérique(s) modifié(s) |
(2)
- Elément(s) du milieu impacté(s) |
(3)
- Type(s) d'aléa impacté(s) |
(3)
- Sous-type(s) d'aléa |
| Glaciers and permafrost | Mass movements, glacial hazards | Rock falls, ice avalanches, debris flows |
Pays
/ Zone |
Massif
/ Secteur |
Site(s) d'étude |
Exposition |
Altitude |
Période(s)
d'observation |
| Italy | Italian Alps |
Monte Rosa |
East face | 2200-4500m asl |
1885-2005 |
(1)
- Modifications des paramètres atmosphériques |
|
Reconstitutions
|
|
Observations |
|
Modélisations |
|
Hypothèses |
|
Informations complémentaires (données utilisées, méthode, scénarios, etc.) |
|
| (2)
- Effets du changement climatique sur le milieu naturel |
|
Reconstitutions
|
The reconstruction of the glacier retreat based on the
first approach shows the continuous retreat of hanging glaciers and firn
fields since the end of the Little Ice Age. Unlike the strong retreat
of many valley-type glaciers since about 1850, the changes of the steep
glaciers in the Monte Rosa east face were not very distinctive from this
time until the 1980s. However, during the last few decades an accelerated
loss in extent of the ice cover becomes evident. Some glaciers (or parts
of glaciers) disappeared within only a few years and they seem to decay
through mass wasting. |
Observations |
The results of the second approach reveal a slight but progressive deglaciation in the Monte Rosa east face since 1956 and in some parts of the face a drastic loss of the ice-covered area in the last 10-15 years. The analysis of the orthophotos also reveals an occasional increase in the extent of certain firn fields and some hanging glaciers. Together, the two methods give an overview over the glacier retreat and reveal the areas with the most pronounced changes in glaciation. |
Modélisations |
Applying PERMAKART, the
lower boundary of the possible permafrost occurrence (where locally permafrost
may occur) is modelled at an altitude of 2700-2800m a.s.l. The lower limit
of probable permafrost (where continuous permafrost is supposed) is located
between 2900 and 3200m a.s.l., depending on the exposition and inclination
of the rock wall. The PERMAKART model tends to overestimate the permafrost
distribution in steep rock and, hence, can be consulted for an indication
of the maximum permafrost occurence in the Monte Rosa east face. |
Hypothèses |
Since the Little Ice Age maximum (about
1850), the lower permafrost limit is estimated to have risen
vertically by about 1m/year (Frauenfelder, 2005). |
Sensibilité du milieu à des paramètres climatiques |
Informations complémentaires (données utilisées, méthode, scénarios, etc.) |
Permafrost occurrence regarding the air temperature, snow cover and altitude Permafrost occurrence and rock temperature |
To assess the permafrost distribution in the Monte Rosa east face and its possible linkage to the slope stability problems, 2 different models were applied aiming at estimating the lower boundary of the permafrost occurrence. The glacier extents for different years were reconstructed by 2 approaches using different data sets. Both approaches were conducted by digitising glacier contours for different years since the early 20th century. |
| (3)
- Effets du changement climatique sur l'aléa |
|
Reconstitutions
|
|
Observations |
Over the recent two decades, the
mass movement activity in the Monte Rosa east face has drastically increased
and new detachment zones of rock falls, debris flows and ice avalanches
have developed. The detachment zones of rock fall are situated in the
very steep rock walls above 3500m a.s.l. and are distributed over the
whole Monte Rosa east face. All detachment zones of rock falls and debris flows are situated in the upper part of the rock wall, between 3400 to 4100m a.s.l. The comparison of changes in glacier extent with current detachment zones shows that many rock fall and most debris flow events originate in recently deglaciated parts of the Monte Rosa east face. An important observation is the spatial shifting of the active detachment zones with decreasing glacier extent. This observation points out that changes in glacier extent might affect slope stability significantly due to drastic changes in surface and also subsurface conditions in the deglaciated areas. The major ice avalanches observed during recent decades occurred particularly in zones with significant glacial changes. But the reactions of hanging glaciers on a rise in atmospheric temperature are varying considerably. In addition, a concentration of detachment zones at transition zones between orthogneiss and paragneiss becomes apparent. (The geology of the Monte Rosa east face is characterized by layers of two different lithologies: orthogneiss and paragneiss.) This indicates that the transition zones between the two lithologies could favour or cause instabilities because of the different geotechnical properties of the two lithologies. The detachment zones of ice avalanches are also situated in the upper part of the flank, but most of them cannot directly be related to the geological setting. In some zones, though, where ice avalanches are influenced by rock fall and debris flows, lithological transition zones may have an indirect impact on the glaciers. |
Modélisations |
|
Hypothèses |
Modelling analyses suggest a probable linkage between permafrost degradation and the formation of detachment zones. Many detachment zones of the present rock fall and debris flow events and also some starting zones of ice avalanches are situated in areas of most probably warm permafrost at the lower boundary of permafrost occurrence. This fact confirms the assumption, that instabilities may be formed in part due to increased temperatures in warm permafrost occurrence, which in turn may lead to decreased shear strength in the rock wall and enhanced water pressure. However, some of the detachment zones of rock fall are situated at higher altitudes where occurrence of cold permafrost is predicted. This suggests that not all rock fall events are directly connected to changes in ground-thermal conditions. A rise in permafrost temperatures may also laterally influence the thermal regime of hanging glaciers and have a destabilizing effect on cold hanging glaciers. Rising temperatures can thereby induce higher ice temperatures and more percolating melt water at the glacier bed and thus increase the stresses at the front of steep glaciers. |
Paramètre de l'aléa |
Sensibilité du paramètres de l'aléa à des paramètres climatiques |
Informations complémentaires (données utilisées, méthode, scénarios, etc.) |
| Slope instabilities frequency | Geology, glaciation and permafrost |
The 3 factors were analysed separately to assess the recent changes and contemporary conditions and the results were compiled for a comparison with the current detachment zones of the ongoing mass movements. These analyses have been done visually by comparing the 3 analysed factors with the positions of the actual detachment zones. |
(4) - Remarques générales |
|
|
(5)
- Syntèses et préconisations
|
In the view of ongoing or even enhanced atmospheric warming and associated changes it is therefore very likely that the slope instabilities in the Monte Rosa east face will continue to represent a critical hazard source. |
Référence citéés :
FRAUENFELDER, R.: Regional-scale modelling of the occurrence and
dynamics of rockglaciers and the distribution of paleopermafrost,
Schriftenreihe Physische Geographie, Glaziologie und Geomorphodynamik,
University of Zurich, 2005.